NAHIC conducted a comprehensive review and analysis of approaches to and measures of positive youth development. In the papers, based on work supported by the W.T. Grant Foundation, NAHIC staff compared the theoretical frameworks of the primary schools of thought in this arena, and examined the domains and constructs of the variables utilized by each. The papers also identify potential pitfalls of inappropriate use of these measures, and offer recommendations for using positive indicators.
February 10, 2004
Claire Brindis, Dr.P.H. Geraldine Oliva, Ph.D. Helen Cagampang, Ph.D.
Developing a Conceptual Model to Select Indicators for the Assessment of Adolescent Health and Well-Being
Assessing the Multiple Processes of Adolescent Health: Youth Development Approaches
Bridging the Gap: Next Steps in Developing and Using Indicators to Improve Adolescent Health
Beyond Indicators: From Risk Assessment to Practical Strategies for Promoting Adolescent Health
MORE NEWS AND ARTICLES BY SIMILAR TOPIC(S)
This study examines the potential role of the health care system in the successful transition to young adulthood for all adolescents, with emphasis on adolescents with special health care needs (ASHCN).
This review of existing preventive health guidelines for adolescents and adults recommends the establishment of “Young Adult Preventive Care Guidelines” that reflect the current evidence-based recommendations that overlap with the young adult age group.
This 2006 issue brief describes the young people who are aging out of foster care, their health status, and the barriers they face when leaving foster care.
This article 2009 examines rates and disparities in access to preventive care and receipt of recommended preventive services among adolescents.
This 2008 article uses AddHealth data to compare rates of mental health counseling use between adolescents and young adults.