This study by researchers in the Division of Adolescent Medicine sought to 1) identify existing adolescent and adult clinical preventive services guidelines relevant to the young adult age group; 2) review, compare, and synthesize these guidelines, with emphasis on the extent to which professional guidelines are consistent with evidence-based guidelines developed by the USPSTF; and 3) recommend next steps in the establishment and integration of preventive guidelines for young adults.
Existing professional and government guidelines were searched to identify guidelines that intersect with the age range of 18 to 26 years. When the ages of 18 to 26 years are “carved” out of established professional guidelines across specialty groups, there are a broad number of recommendations, many supported by sufficient evidence to receive a USPSTF grade of A or B, that can inform the care of young adults.
The study recommends the establishment of “Young Adult Preventive Care Guidelines” that reflect the current evidence-based recommendations that overlap with the young adult age group; suggest clinician and health care system supports to facilitate the delivery of preventive services to young adults, and emphasize prioritizing research in prevention areas where sufficient evidence does not exist.
Young Adult Preventive Health Care Guidelines: There but Can’t Be Found; Elizabeth M. Ozer, PhD; John T. Urquhart, BA; Claire D. Brindis, DrPH; M. Jane Park, MPH; Charles E. Irwin Jr, MD; Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(3):240-247
March 5, 2012
Elizabeth M. Ozer, PhD; John T. Urquhart, BA; Claire D. Brindis, DrPH, MPH; M. Jane Park, MPH; and Charles E. Irwin, Jr., MD
MORE NEWS AND ARTICLES BY SIMILAR TOPIC(S)
This 2010 brief, created by the Center of Adolescent Health and the Law (CAHL) and NAHIIC, reviews major provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act highlighting those of greatest significance for these young people.
This 2008 article examines research related to stress and stress management, with a focus on young males.
This 2008 article discusses gaps in research and offers recommendations for improving health care quality and strengthening the research base on gender and disparities during adolescence.
This 2009 paper assesses primary care providers’ rates of screening for emotional distress among adolescent patients and argues that primary care clinicians/systems need to better utilize the primary care visit to screen adolescents for emotional health.
Using data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth this study: (1) identifies profiles of risky behaviors, (2) investigates how environmental characteristics predict these profiles of risky behaviors (e.g., delinquency, smoking, drug use, drinking, sexual behavior, and exercise), and (3) examines how these profiles of risky behaviors relate to positive and negative youth outcomes.